lesson
Voluntary, Involuntary, and Non-Voluntary Actions
Distinguish between voluntary, involuntary (under compulsion or through ignorance), and non-voluntary actions regarding moral responsibility.
Updated 1 month ago · 2 views
Premium Lesson
This lesson is part of a track
Public learning track
Aristotelian Virtue Ethics: Foundations and Character
7 lessons
Goal
Master Aristotle's core teleological framework, including eudaimonia, the function argument, moral habituation, the doctrine of the mean, and moral responsibility.
7 lessons
0 of 7 done
- Telos and the Good: Aristotle's Teleological WorldviewUp next
- Eudaimonia: Human Flourishing and the Supreme GoodNot started yet
- The Ergon (Function) Argument and the Human SoulNot started yet
- Moral Virtue as Character Dispositions and HabituationNot started yet
- The Doctrine of the Mean and Feeling at the Right TimesNot started yet
- Phronesis: Practical Wisdom and Moral DeliberationNot started yet
- Voluntary, Involuntary, and Non-Voluntary ActionsYou are here
Learning standards covered
PHIL-8.2General Certificate of Education Advanced Level (UK A-Level) · Philosophy · 11th Gradenormative ethics: utilitarianism (act and rule; hedonist and preference forms); Kantian deontological ethics and Aristotelian virtue ethics, including the definitions of good/bad/right/wrong within each approach and similarities/differences across approaches
PHIL-1.2General Certificate of Education Advanced Level (UK A-Level) · Philosophy · 11th Gradedevelop an understanding of the core concepts of philosophy and begin to develop their own skill of conceptual analysis, through the study of the ways in which philosophers have analysed concepts and have, through conceptual analysis, identified subtle differences which have a wider impact on philosophical arguments
PHIL-2.1General Certificate of Education Advanced Level (UK A-Level) · Philosophy · 11th Gradeunderstand the ways in which philosophers have analysed the core concepts of philosophy, and be able to identify how subtle differences in analyses can have wider impacts on philosophical arguments