The Marshall Trilogy and Domestic Dependent Nations

Tribal Sovereignty, Federal Indian Law, and Wind River Treaties

Updated 1 month ago · 2 views

Analyze the foundational Supreme Court decisions in Johnson v. M'Intosh, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, and Worcester v. Georgia and their doctrine of tribal status.

Premium Lesson

Upgrade to unlock this lesson, practice questions, and your personal tutor.

This lesson is part of a track

Public learning track

Tribal Sovereignty, Federal Indian Law, and Wind River Treaties

9th Grade · Social Studies · US-WY-SS

6 lessons

Goal

Analyze the legal foundations of inherent tribal sovereignty, foundational federal Indian law doctrines, and the historical treaties establishing the Wind River Indian Reservation.

6 lessons

0 of 6 done

Inherent Sovereignty and Pre-Constitutional Tribal AuthorityUp next
The Marshall Trilogy and Domestic Dependent NationsYou are here
Treaty-Making, Land Cessions, and Retained RightsNot started yet
The 1868 Fort Bridger Treaty and Eastern Shoshone SovereigntyNot started yet
The Northern Arapaho Settlement on Wind RiverNot started yet
United States v. Shoshone Tribe and Property RightsNot started yet

View full track

Learning standards covered

SS12.1.3.aWyoming Social Studies Standards · 5th Grade

Analyze the historical development of governance of the Indigenous Tribes of Wyoming through U.S. Congressional Acts and U.S. Supreme Court decisions (e.g., Per Capita Act, Marshall Trilogy, U.S. v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians)