The Ethics of Deception and Institutional Review Boards

Ethics, Integrity, and Critical Evaluation in Psychological Science

Updated 1 month ago · 3 views

Evaluate the justification of deception in psychological studies and the oversight role of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).

Premium Lesson

Upgrade to unlock this lesson, practice questions, and your personal tutor.

This lesson is part of a track

Public learning track

Ethics, Integrity, and Critical Evaluation in Psychological Science

9th Grade · Social Studies · US-IL-SS

7 lessons

Goal

Evaluate ethical guidelines, historical case studies, open science reforms, and popular media claims to design responsible psychological investigations.

7 lessons

0 of 7 done

APA Ethical Guidelines for Human ParticipantsUp next
The Ethics of Deception and Institutional Review BoardsYou are here
Historical Unethical Studies: Milgram, Stanford, and TuskegeeNot started yet
Ethics in Animal Research in Psychological ScienceNot started yet
The Replication Crisis and Open Science PracticesNot started yet
Evaluating Scientific Claims in Popular MediaNot started yet
Designing an Ethical Psychological InvestigationNot started yet

View full track

Learning standards covered

SS.Psy.2.9-12Illinois Social Studies Standards · All ages

Evaluate the conclusions made by psychological research, including ethical concerns.