lesson
Identifying When Evidence Does Not Support a Working Claim
Recognize when collected data and primary quotes directly refute rather than confirm an inquiry hypothesis.
Updated 6 days ago · 1 view
Premium Lesson
You've completed the free lessons in this track. Upgrade to unlock all 7 lessons, practice questions, and your personal tutor.
This lesson is part of a track
Public learning track
Identifying Counter-Evidence and Modifying Disciplinary Claims
4th Grade · Social-studies · US-WI-SS
7 lessons
Goal
Learn to detect conflicting evidence and apply qualifying language to adjust claims across historical, geographic, civic, and economic inquiries.
7 lessons
0 of 7 done
- Identifying When Evidence Does Not Support a Working ClaimYou are here
- 2Distinguishing Between Counter-Evidence and Minor ExceptionsPremiumUp next
- 3Adjusting a Historical Claim When Eyewitness Accounts ConflictNot started yet
- 4Revising a Geographic Claim After Examining Outlier DataNot started yet
- 5Modifying a Civic Claim to Address Minority ViewpointsNot started yet
- 6Refining an Economic Claim When Market Exceptions AriseNot started yet
- 7Using Qualifier Words to Make Claims DefensibleNot started yet
Learning standards covered
SS.Inq3.c.mWisconsin Social Studies Standards · 4th GradeAnalyze the extent to which evidence supports or does not support a claim, and if it does not, adjust claim appropriately.
SS.Inq3.c.hWisconsin Social Studies Standards · 4th GradeAnalyze the extent to which evidence supports or does not support a claim, and if it does not, modify the claim appropriately.