Constructing Balanced, Persuasive, and Critical Legal Essays
Write high-scoring critical evaluation essays that articulate competing jurisprudential perspectives, substantiate arguments with primary legal authority, and refute counter-arguments.

Write high-scoring critical evaluation essays that articulate competing jurisprudential perspectives, substantiate arguments with primary legal authority, and refute counter-arguments.
Upgrade to unlock this lesson, practice questions, and your personal tutor.
11th Grade · Social Studies · UK A-Level
5 lessons
Synthesise complex factual scenarios, apply statutory interpretation and judicial precedent, resolve conflicting authorities, and formulate persuasive legal arguments.
AS and A level specifications must require students, in respect of each private and public area of substantive law they are required to study, to analyse, apply and evaluate the legal rules and principles of that area of law. Analysis and application must include the ability to identify and breakdown into constituent parts the relevant legal rules and principles for each area of law and apply those legal principles to a hypothetical scenario. Evaluation must require students to formulate a reasoned argument to support a particular proposition by reference to the relevant legal rules and principles that support that argument.
AS and A level specifications must require students to construct clear, concise and logical legal arguments which are substantiated by legal authority, using appropriate legal terminology. In addition, at A level students must be required to construct a persuasive argument including instances where they have recognised that there are no clear legal precedents or conflicting precedents to solve a problem.
A level specifications must require students to analyse and critically evaluate legal issues by identifying different perspectives, being able to support their identification of the strongest viewpoint and demonstrating the ability to counter alternative viewpoints.