lesson

Updated 6 days ago Β· 1 view
If you connect a standard digital multimeter to measure a tiny resistance change, lead resistance and internal meter inaccuracies can ruin your measurement. How can we measure unknown resistance with parts-per-million accuracy without relying on the exact calibration of a meter?
In 1833, Samuel Hunter Christie invented a diamond-shaped circuit to compare resistances, which Sir Charles Wheatstone later popularized in 1843 for testing telegraph lines.
This circuit, called a Wheatstone bridge, uses a null measurement technique β a method where you balance two circuit paths until zero current flows across a detector, making the measurement independent of meter calibration.
πInteractive diagram
How do the voltages at nodes B and D relate to each other when no current passes through the central detector?
Deriving the Balance Condition
A Wheatstone bridge consists of two parallel voltage dividers β circuits of two series resistors that split a total input voltage into a smaller output voltage proportional to their resistances.
The potential at node B relative to ground node C is given by VBβ=Vsβ(R1β+R2βR2ββ), and the potential at node D is VDβ=Vsβ(R3β+R4βR4ββ).
The bridge reaches balance when the detector reads zero volts (VGβ=VBββVDβ=0), meaning both nodes have identical electrical potentials: VBβ=VDβ.
πInteractive diagram
Notice that the supply voltage Vsβ cancels out completely. This means bridge balance depends strictly on resistance ratios, never on battery fluctuations.
How do we rearrange this ratio to find the exact value of an unknown test resistor?